Eastman Visit Follows Week of Sabotage by Robert Stowe England

David Virtue DVirtue236 at AOL.COM
Tue Nov 20 00:54:50 EST 2001

Eastman Visit Follows Week of Sabotage

By Robert Stowe England

ACCOKEEK, Maryland -- The divisions within Christ Church St. John's
Parish here were clear and unmistakable today as Acting Bishop Jane
Dixon, for the third consecutive week, sent a representative to the
parish to lead or take part in services, thwarting the ability of the
interim rector, Fr. Stephen Arpee, to be celebrant and preacher.

The visit came after a week of efforts presumed to come from the Dixon
camp to sabotage the parish's 76th annual ham and oyster dinner on

Retired Maryland Bishop Ted Eastman, who had celebrated mass at a
single 10 a.m. service on November 4, was back again as the celebrant
and preacher at both the regular 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. services. In both
services Fr. Arpee, who was cleared to go ahead as interim rector by
Dixon on Friday, assisted on the altar.

When asked if he intended to be present every Sunday, he replied, "Oh,
no. I'll be here when just I am ordered to be." Eastman was Dixon's
choice for interim rector. Dixon suggested his name to the vestry
shortly after a federal court ousted Fr. Samuel Edwards as rector in
response to a civil lawsuit brought by Dixon. The vestry, however, told
Dixon they had already selected Fr. Arpee.

Fr. Edwards is appealing the judge's order and is also seeking a stay
of the order pending appeal, which would allow him to return as rector.
He and his family face possible eviction from the rectory after
November 30. He has stayed away from church services, since he was
barred from holding them, and has been attending other Episcopal and
Anglican parishes in the Washington area each of the last three

The congregation's Dixon supporters were delighted at Bishop Eastman's
return, while the rest of the congregation were asking one another
whether Fr. Arpee would be allowed to pursue his ministry in the parish
in peace. There was considerable resentment from some against his
return so soon after his November 4 visit.

The vestry is unable to refuse Bishop Eastman's visit because Judge
Peter J. Messitte of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District
of Maryland in Greenbelt, has issued an order in late October that they
must allow Dixon or her surrogate to come to the parish to hold
services and meetings. Charles Nalls of deKieffer & Horgan, who
represents Fr. Edwards and the parish, wanred Judge Messitte that if he
granted such an order Dixon or one of her delegates might possibly be
at the parish every single Sunday.

Normally, a bishop of a diocese only visits each parish once every two
or three years. Since the crisis at Accokeek erupted in March when Fr.
Edwards took up his position as rector, Dixon has visited at least six
times, and Eastman has been here at least three times. Several other
bishops were sent at Dixon's request to sit in the congregation over
the summer.

Some of those who oppose Dixon's relentless campaign against Fr.
Edwards and the parish stayed away because Bishop Eastman was
celebrating the mass, while a half dozen others who attended did not go
forward for communion. Some stated afterward that it was because Bishop
Eastman was there as a representative of Dixon that they felt they
could not take communion.

Attendance at the 10 a.m. service today was an unusually high at 83,
boosted by the arrival of a 16-member contingent from an African-
American Bible church, Save the Seed Ministries in White Plains, Md.
Members of the traditionalist church have expressed sympathy for Christ
Church's struggle against the diocese's attempt to impose its
heterodox, revisionist views.

"We're here to offer our prayers" said one of the visitors from Save
the Seed after the service. He indicated they would be returning,
perhaps with additional members from their congregation, from time to

On November 11, when Fr. Arpee was co-celebrant with Fr. Ken Howard,
the vicar of St. Nicholas Episcopal Church, a mission in Darnestown,
Md. Attendance was low at this service, as nearly all of the pro-Dixon
faction in the parish stayed away.

Attendance was over 130 on November 4, when Bishop Eastman was the
celebrant, and the church was filled with more than 20 people whom
parish leaders say had never visited the church before. Forty people
dropped pledge cards in the offering plates that Sunday even though
none had been given out by parish officials. A source from the pro-
Dixon faction claims that the diocese provided these cards for those
who had attended the alternative services during the summer and fall
and were now just returning to the parish.

The newcomers from Save the Seed were invited by the vestry. Their
presence suggested the parish would not sit idly by as the diocese
attempted a takeover by sending in people loyal to the bishop from
outside the parish. Their presence was all the more relevant, as
details of a planned coup against the vestry orchestrated by Dixon had
continued to leak out over the last two weeks.

While members of the pro-Dixon group reported they were happy to see
Bishop Eastman, some expressed frustration with the fact that Fr. Arpee
was the interim and that so far they had not gained very much from
their efforts on behalf of the bishop. Some of them falsely believe
that Fr. Arpee is a member of Forward in Faith and had been told this
by the diocese. Fr. Arpee is a member of the American Anglican Council,
but not Forward in Faith.

Many in the pro-Dixon group are elderly and support the bishop because,
they say, they believe that the bishop's wishes for the parishes must
be obeyed. Only a small number of the pro-Dixon group has expressed
support for the diocese's pro-homosexual agenda, while many in this
group say they do not believe that these policies will ever affect
their parish.

Resentment against the vestry and the traditionalist majority in the
parish appears to have erupted in a series of incidents surrounding the
parish's annual annual ham and oyster dinner, which is held annually to
raise funds for the parish.

On Wednesday morning vestry member Wes Courtney discovered that the
signs for the dinner that had been posted around Accokeek had all been
taken down over night.

Courtney phoned Senior Warden Barbara Sturman and asked "What are you
going to do?" she told the gathering in the church during the
announcement period following Bishop Eastman's sermon.

Mrs. Sturman reported that her husband, Frank Sturman, "made some
makeshift signs" to replace the signs that were taken down. These new
signs were put out every morning around the community and then taken in
every evening, from Wednesday through Saturday.

While no one has taken credit for removing the signs, members of the
parish suspect one or more persons from the pro-Dixon faction is behind

Thursday morning Mrs. Sturman found yet another incident aimed at
disrupting the annual dinner when she drove past the church and saw a
white car with a Prince Georges County logo on it. She stopped and
found that a health inspector from the county was there to inspect the
parish kitchen. "I hear there's an illegal dinner going on here," the
woman inspector told Mrs. Sturman. Not so, Mrs. Sturman replied, and
told the inspector about the annual affair.

The inspector conducted an inspection and gave the kitchen a clean bill
of health, Mrs. Sturman reports. "It was nice to know we do everything
according to the health code," she said. This incident, like the one in
which signs were removed, is believed to be the work of one or more of
the Dixon's supporters.

Mrs. Sturman also reported that some of the people in the community who
regularly attend the annual dinner had been told by members of the pro-
Dixon faction that there would be no ham and oyster dinner this year.

In spite of all the efforts to sabotage the dinner, it was a success,
says Mrs. Sturman, raising over $4,000. An additional $1,000 was raised
from the sale of candy and another $1,400 was raised for the altar
guild. While nearly all congregation applauded the success of the
dinner, a number from the pro-Dixon faction did not applaud.

The tension was all the greater as leaks came from the pro-Dixon
faction and elsewhere that Dixon was plotting a coup against the vestry
at some future meeting of the congregation when, so one source claims,
the entire vestry would be replaced by one that was willing to support
Dixon's revisionist policies affirming the practice of homosexuality as
morally upright, including blessings by the church of same-sex couples
and the ordination of non-celibate homosexuals into the priesthood.

The weeks ahead promise to continue the tension between the two camps,
as more interference is expected both from Dixon and her supporters,
who seem to have grown increasingly hostile and aggressive toward the
vestry and the traditionalist majority in the parish.


More information about the VirtueOnline mailing list